Satire, Politics, New England, Bullshit

DOMEOFGLASS.COM

New Hampshire's First-in-the-Nation Primary Redux

    In October 2009 I posted an impassioned plea for the abolition of New Hampshire's First-In-the-Nation Primary.
    Unfortunately, my well-reasoned catalogue of lies and exaggerations fell on deaf ears or, perhaps, no ears at all.
    In any event, with another upcoming First-in-the-Nation Primary currently enveloping the citizens of the Granite State like a toxic fog, I feel it altogether fitting and proper to repost the post (or, if you prefer, republish the publish). Everything in the article remains as invalid as the day it was written.
.
   
   The First-in-the-Nation New Hampshire Primary: Time for Change  

    There is a non-existent groundswell of ill-informed opinion among New Hampshire residents (you can see the ground swelling in back of my house where a leak in the water main is seeping into the soil) demanding that New Hampshire’s First-in-the-Nation Presidential Primary status be destroyed or repealed or whatever (assuming a status can be destroyed or repealed or whatever).
    With this goal in mind, a Community Action Group called ME, headed by me and consisting of me, has been formed to pressure our representatives in Concord, whoever they are, to take immediate action on this matter and also to have Nancy Pelosi earmark funds in her next appropriation bill naming ME as an organization entitled to regular injections of Federal stimulus money and recreational drugs.
    A resolution has been drafted by some of the finest legal minds at ME. It will soon be submitted to whomever it was I didn’t vote for in the last election as soon as I find out who he or she or it are or is. The Resolution follows

NEW HAMPSHIRE RESOLUTION BS-123456789-PDQ

Section I — WHEREASES {Acts of the Legislature, also known as Articles of Stupidity, are required to be prefaced with as many "whereases," as the lawyers can think of]

    WHEREAS the voters of New Hampshire have increasingly shown a tendency to select losing candidates in the Presidential Primary
        and
    WHEREAS the population of New Hampshire is ridiculously small compared to California, Massachusetts, and almost every other State
        and
    
WHEREAS the population of New Hampshire is excessively white and heterosexual and therefore incapable of empathizing with people of different hues, facial features, literacy rates, sexual orientations, and congenital diseases
        
and
    
WHEREAS New Hampshirites are sick and tired of having their roadsides defaced every four years with thousands of red, white, and blue placards bearing the names of people they never met and probably wouldn’t invite into their homes if they did meet them
        
and
    
WHEREAS no one has ever been known to have been swayed from voting for someone like Chauncey Milkswonger because someone named Mary-Jo Frauncelot lined Route 101 in Keene with 1,000 expensive plastic pieces of crap while Milkswonger only sprang for 150 cheap cardboard pieces of crap
        
and
    
WHEREAS the citizens of New Hampshire are an aging population suffering from a variety of age-related illnesses such as baldness, ingrown toenails, bushy eyebrows, heartburn, Restless Leg Syndrome, and a tendency to shop at Walmart
        and
    
WHEREAS said Elderly People do not wish to be interrupted at their dinner tables night after night by auto-dial phone calls from candidates hawking push polls
        
and
    
WHEREAS it is cruel and unconscionable to encourage politically active ladies from Peterborough to parade in front of Town Hall in inclement weather in their support hose, Murray Space Shoes, and bulky-knit sweaters carrying signs proclaiming their solidarity with the Taliban
        
and
    
WHEREAS all right-thinking New Hampshirites are already known to be in favor of Peace, Polar Bears, and Cheap Sources of Renewable Energy Through Magic, and are opposed to Wall Street, Big Oil, Windfall Profits, and the late President Bush
        
and
    WHEREAS said Politically Correct New Hampshirites do not wish to be constantly interrupted, while they are watching Sex in the City reruns or the Woman With a Five-Hundred-Pound Tumor on the Discovery Health Channel, by commercials featuring Jean Shaheen speaking out in favor of Peace, Polar Bears, and Cheap Sources of Renewable Energy Through Magic, and condemning the evils of Wall Street, Big Oil, Windfall Profits, and the late President Bush
        
and
    
WHEREAS we have now run out of whereases

Section II — THEREFORES AND MOREOVERS

    BE
IT THEREFORE highly resolved, that WE, the duly elected Senate and Legislature of New Hampshire meeting in Concord or someplace warmer, do hereby Proclaim that The Sovereign State of New Hampshire will henceforth and forever be the LAST state in the union to hold primaries
        
and
    
MOREOVER Should another state in this union or any other union have the audacity to attempt to horn in on our turf, the Secretary of State of New Hampshire (not Hillary Clinton; asshole), shall delay the New Hampshire primary further and further into the future to ensure that the New Hampshire Primary is the LAST in the Nation
        
and
    
THEREFORE AND MOREOVER Such action or actions shall be taken notwithstanding if such action or actions result in said primary occurring after the election ITSELF is DONE AND FINISHED.

—————————-

    Friends and fellow Americans! You can help ME in this fight. Send your contributions to ME, care of me, Norm Mack. Please make your checks out to "Cash" so there won’t be any awkward questions from the Feds. Any contribution no matter how small will be appreciated in these difficult times. (However, $100 would be a nice round sum. Feel free to send more if you’ve hit the lottery or are drunk or feeble-minded.)
    If you’re feeling lucky and FairPoint is having one of its good days, you can reach ME (me) at dog@myfairpoint.net. (I wish to hell they hadn’t stuck that "my" in front of "fairpoint." They are not my FairPoint and I don’t like them making me say that they are.)

Norm Mack, Peterborough, dog@myfairpoint.net

Pigs in a Poke

Pig in a poke:  A thing you buy without knowing its true nature or value, especially when you don’t inspect it beforehand. (In Israel the expression is "Cat in a Sack." I guess there’s no call for pork there.)
    Most of the baker’s dozen of Presidents who have occupied the White House over the last 80 years have been okay. They range from the excellent (Harry Truman) to the pretty good (Roosevelt and Reagan) to the competent but flawed (Nixon and Johnson) to the fair-to-middling (the two Bushes and Clinton) to the weak (Kennedy) to the innocuous (Eisenhower and Ford).

    Of the 13, only two have been God-awful ─ Jimmy Carter and the present incumbent, Barack Obama.
    Carter was reputed to be bright and hard-working.
    Objective information about Obama’s intelligence or lack of same has been carefully shielded from the public leading many to assume that he’s a dunce. As far as work habits go, he doesn’t seem to have any.
    But aside from differences in IQs, SATs, and noses to the grindstone, the men share two far more vital characteristics: 

Both were totally unfit to lead the nation.
Both were "Pigs in a Poke," voted into office by a dice-rolling electorate that let hope trump reason

    It’s easy to understand why the two men won their elections.
    Each ran against a weak opponent (Carter against Gerald Ford; Obama against John McCain).
    Carter’s narrow victory over Ford was helped by a lingering revulsion to Ford’s predecessor, Richard Nixon.
    Obama’s sound thrashing of McCain was ensured by the overwhelming support given him by a politicized media establishment, by a public that was eager to show its racial tolerance, and by an outrageously partisan Black voting block that cast 95% of its ballots for its native son.
    There is a more significant question than the election itself, however: Why were two nobodies like Obama and Carter nominated by their party in the first place?
    The answer is not hard to find once you realize that Liberalism is not a coherent political philosophy based on rational thought or enlightened self-interest, but is, rather, a religion, and that all too often it is the Liberal tail that wags the Democrat dog.
    That Liberalism is a religion is not a very original concept. Try Googling "Liberalism Is a Religion" and you’ll get close to 700,000 hits, an impressive number when compared, say, to the 90,000 or so you’ll get by Googling the popular search phrase "J Lo’s Ass."
    In addition to hallmark qualities shared by other religions and cults ─ Hatred, Irrationality, Intolerance, Fanaticism , and Blind Faith ─ Liberalism also suffers from an even more dangerous religious characteristic ─ the yearning for a Messiah, a superhuman leader who will arise like Gilgamesh, sword in hand, to save the world from the barbarians (i.e., conservatives, moderates, rednecks, born-again Christians, White heterosexual Males, and Sarah Palin).
    In the past, we have had a succession of would-be Liberal saviors.
    The trend seems to have started with FDR who, in addition to being an inspirational wartime leader, was looked upon as the physical embodiment of Jehovah by all good Liberals and whose god-head was frequently affirmed by Henry Fonda and other Hollywood luminaries.
    Here’s a list of other Liberals who have aspired to Messiahdom and have come and gone like King Lear’s packs and sects of great ones, that ebb and flow by the moon.

● Henry Agard Wallace, FDR’s one-time far-left vice president, whose failed attempt to defeat Harry Truman bitterly disappointed left-wing Democrats, the Communist parry, and my mother.
● Adlai Stevenson, two-time loser to Dwight Eisenhower, whose genteel manners and professorial demeanor enraptured gay voters, Leonard Bernstein, and the city of Madison, Wisconsin.
● Mario Cuomo, the golden-tongued boy orator of the Plains and Albany, NY, who electrified the 1984 Democrat convention with a ringing keynote oration about absolutely nothing at all.
● Howard Dean whose 2004 "I Have a Scream" speech after losing the Iowa caucus was unfairly used against him by almost everyone with any common sense.
● Eugene McCarthy who ended Lyndon Johnson’s political career with a near victory in the 1968 New Hampshire Primary based on his opposition to the Vietnam War ─ after which he was never heard from again.
● George McGovern, the man who replaced the murdered Robert Kennedy in Liberal affections and was the Democrat presidential candidate in 1968 and 1972. He managed to get clobbered both times despite columnist Mary McGrory’s tear-drenched editorial pleas.

    Blessedly, the country was spared the depredations that would have been wrought by this ragtag collection of incompetents, weaklings, weirdoes, flash-in-the-pans, and one-shot wonders.
    Perhaps luck will again be on the nation’s side when and if our current Boob-in-Chief vacates the White House, but I fear that the American public’s tendency to gamble its future on left-wing Pigs-in-the-Poke will not die out and that false Messiah after false Messiah will continue to erupt like poisonous toadstools from the rotted manure of Liberalism’s godless religion.
    There may be a special providence for drunkards, fools, and the United States of America as Otto von Bismark was reputed to have said, but even the most fortunate gambler eventually runs out of luck.
    If our democracy ever fails and dictatorship does come to America, it will not be in the form of a ranting megalomaniac like Adolf Hitler...or a sadistic, manipulative party-hack like Joseph Stalin...or a corrupt demagogue like Huey Long...or an iron-fisted lunatic like Mao Zedong...or a drunken adventurer like Joseph McCarthy.
    It will arrive slowly and subtly in the shape of a duly-elected Pig-in-the-Poke populist President who, like Julius Caesar seduces the masses with promises of helping the "little man" against "Wall Street," who suppresses free speech in the name of "ensuring fairness in the press," who mobilizes "the youth" to riot in the street against "injustice," who claims to fight wealth disparities by stealing from the rich and giving to the government, who packs the courts with party henchmen, who governs by executive fiat rather than by legislative act, and who, finally, gains control over the armed forces via the installation of crony loyalists as civilian and military overseers.
    For those who care about freedom and liberty ─ that is to say, anybody who doesn’t worship at the shrine of Liberalism ─ don’t say you've not been warned..

Norm Mack, Peterborough, dog@myfairpoint.net

Study Shows Sugary Soft Drinks Cause Inner City Crime

    David Hemenway of the Harvard School of Public Health, (as opposed to the Harvard School of Private Health) is stunned (but not rendered speechless) by the results of his recent, well-funded and highly-publicized study of beverage consumption among inner city teens.
    According to the AFP (Agence France-Presse), Prof. Hemenway discovered that the more soft drinks a teenager consumes, the more attacks he launches against classmates, enemies, girlfriends, ho’s, bro’s, relatives, teachers, whitey, and just about anyone unfortunate enough to cross his path.
    "It was shocking to us when we saw how clear the relationship was," the professor said as he mopped sweat from his brow, choked back tears, and blew his nose.
    Hemenway went on to explain that more than 1,875 teenagers (1,878 to be precise), almost all of them African-American, Hispanic, or some sort of admixture, were asked how many carbonated non-diet soft drinks they had consumed in the previous seven days. They were also asked whether they drank alcohol, smoked, carried a weapon or showed violence towards peers, family members and "partners. "
    What emerged, said Hemenway, was strong evidence of "dose response," demonstrating that teenage rapes, muggings, stabbings, shootings, hair pullings, sucker punchings, bitings, burnings, axings, etc. were caused by the excessive consumption of fizzy sodas* much as obesity is caused by overdosing on McDonalds’ French fries, and Congress is caused by too many politicians.
    Even more incredibly phenomenal, Hemenway also unearthed the astonishing fact that crime rates were much higher among inner city youths than among teenagers living in the wealthier suburbs where, presumably, the consumption of sugary carbonated beverages was far lower and the intake of arugala, latte, tofu, and vodka tonics much higher.
    The brand names of the guilty drinks have not yet been released nor has the exact mathematical relationship between soft drink intake and violence. (Preliminary analysis suggests that 3 cans Coke × 2 cans Pepsi + 1/2 can Sprite = 2 statutory rapes + 1/3 of a mugging.)

* * *

    Inspired by Professor Hemenway’s groundbreaking, earthshaking, and mind-boggling research, Dome of Glass has undertaken a battery of similar studies in hopes of obtaining fat grants from the federal government, state government, and forward-looking universities such as Cornell, Harvard, Yale, and Fairleigh Dickinson.
    Here are some early fruits and vegetables of these studies plucked from various trees, bushes, weeds, shrubs, and algae.

● A stunningly amazing NIH- (National Institutes of Health) funded investigation of 3,872 cases of gang-related murders in Chicago in August 2006, found that 99 percent of the homicides involved males and females between the ages of five and 93. A statistical breakdown of the results also uncovered the astounding fact that 22.6 percent of the black male victims had eaten at McDonalds’s or other "fast-food" establishments during the week leading up to their deaths while an even more disturbing 86.7 percent of Hispanic female victims had either shopped at or shoplifted from Walmart during the same period.
● A joint study with the police departments of Jaffrey and Peterborough uncovered the shocking fact that over 63 percent of men and women convicted of DWI in the period between August 3, 1927, and September, 13, 2005, were wearing pants at the time of their arrest while only 22 percent were wearing skirts. (The remainder were either were naked or dressed in culottes except for two men who had their flies open at the time of apprehension and were not included in the statistics.) In another incredible revelation, 79 percent of the trousered group were found to have either boxer shorts or jockey shorts beneath their pants (four respondents had jockey shorts outside their pants) while 36 percent of the skirt contingent were wearing no underwear at all.
● A new study of 6,714 hunting fatalities in Vermont and New Hampshire in the years 1892, 1918, 1975, and 2001 through 2007 found that soft-drink consumption was significantly higher among bow-and-arrow manslaughterers than shotgun and rifle manslaughterers. Moreover, 98 percent of all respondents acknowledged having consumed one or more glasses of water in the one-week period prior to the killing whereas only 87 percent had more than twice the legal limit of alcohol in their blood streams. Although most deaths were attributed by police to mistaken identity (man for moose, wife for deer, grandfather for bear, child for bunny rabbit, pet dog for mother-in-law) it is noteworthy that only five deer, one moose, two bunny rabbits, one mother-in-law, and no bears were bagged in the same period. The study also found that more than 50 percent of the shooters were retired policemen and 97.3 percent of the shootees were in-laws of the shooter.
● In a CBS-New York Times-Dome of Glass study of fatalities and crippling accidents in the 20th and 21st centuries involving people with the surname Kennedy, a startling contrast emerged between Kennedies who had inherited nest eggs of more than $200 million (27 deaths, five murders, 145 fractures, 217 stints in rehab, 17 plane crashes) and Kennedies with annual incomes below $50,000 (two bad hair days and three damaged nail cuticles). Greek-American savant George Stephanopoulos, co-head of the research team, said, "I was stunned to discover this correlation between great wealth and bad luck." When it was pointed out that all of the bad luck originated from Hyannis Port, Massachusetts, Mr. Stephanopoulos said regression analysis had shown it to be a "statistical quirk" which had been discounted by himself and impartial ombudsperson Nancy Pelosi.
● A cross-cultural study by Norm Mack of Peterborough, New Hampshire (which he hopes will soon be funded by UNESCO) has turned up a remarkable correlation between the non-consumption of mashed plantain root and the incidence of traffic accidents among Caucasian grandmothers. In-depth interviews with 58,799 Ugandan and Botswanan grandmothers, all of them regular eaters of mashed plantain root, found not a single fender-bender, head-on crash, or other automobile-connected incident that involved a white woman. In contrast, a survey of Swedish female drivers of similar age, none of whom had eaten any mashed plantain root, showed that blond, white-skinned grandmothers had damaged or obliterated more than 2,700 Volvos during the previous 10-year period. Legislation currently making its way though the Swedish Reichstag will require all fair-haired whitish women of non-child-bearing age to eat at least two 216 mg servings of mashed plantain every day.

* During a Question-and-Answer session following the AFP interview, a New Hampshire malcontent was taken into custody by police on charges of bigotry after asking whether teenagers who smoke, drink, snort cocaine, shoot dope, carry firearms, smoke crack cocaine, beat up girls, rob, and murder might also enjoy a refreshing can of Coke after each rampage.

Norm Mack, Peterborough, dog@myfairpoint.net

Dogbert to Ratbert: "Follow Me! I'll Make You Dead"

Whaddya know! I'm not the only person in the world who thinks that mobs like the Occupy Whatever assholes are a bunch of sheep being herded by fascist sheepdogs.
   


Norm Mack, Peterborough, dog@myfairpoint.net

So Long Barney, Its Been Bad To Know Ya (Via Michael Ramirez)


They say it ain't over till the fat lady sings.
Well Fat Barney's warbled her farewell aria...Let's pray she means it.

Norm Mack, Peterborought,
dog@myfairpoint.net

Alas, Poor Barney ─ 'Tis Pity He's a Whore


                                
                                 This is the ugliest photo I could find of Frank, but the
                                            rest aren't much better.
Maybe I should photoshop
                                            one or two. I'll bet Barney would like that, it's his style

    Someone reading Dome of Glass might think that I have some sort of visceral dislike, even hatred, for long-time Massachusetts Democrat Representative Barney Frank.
    Well, if you’re laboring under such a suspicion, this is to let you know that you’re absolutely right.
    I loathe Frank. I loathe his blubbery face. I loathe his immoral behavior. I loathe his attack-dog politics. And I loathe the lies, evasions, viciousness, and moral cowardice that characterize the man.
    By coincidence (this post was already written pre-Thanksgiving) Frank announced on Monday that he will not seek reelection. Of course, if you’re familiar with the behavior of the Massachusetts pimp, he may very well yield to the pleas of his loyal constituency of idiots, fag hags, and congenital Liberals and rise from his silk-lined coffin like Dracula to seek re-election.

* * *

    My detestation of Frank (as opposed to mere revulsion) is nothing new, but was solidified a few months ago when I happened to remote* onto Bill O’Reilly exchanging insults with the Massachusetts brothel operator ** Before I was able to switch channels, I was rendered immobile by the yawning chasm of Frank’s mouth as it ejaculated a torrential sewer of fabrications, half-truths, and spittle concerning, as I recall, the cause of the 2008 housing bubble and the ensuing worldwide economic downturn.
    Amazingly, the Massachusetts gay panderer was able to shout down even O’Reilly, an acknowledged master of the put-down, shut-down, and turn-off as he blamed the catastrophe on Big Banks, Big Oil, Republican Lobbyists, Right-Wing Conservatives, Henry Kissinger, Wall Street Speculators, the Tea Party, George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, Southern Baptists, and ─ if memory serves ─ George Washington, the Gabor sisters, the Ku Klux Klan, and the Three Stooges.

    Let’s set the record straight.

The recession that engulfed America, Europe, and most of the developed world is the direct result of policies promulgated by BARNEY FRANK, ramrodded through congress by BARNEY FRANK, and forced down the throats of financial institutions by BARNEY FRANK.

    It was Frank, with his motor-mouth, his machinations, and his threats (all wrapped in standard Liberal pita as "help for the poor, the needy, and the blacks") that coerced and duped and bullied presidents and courts and legislators into pursuing the ruinous, irrational fiscal policies that led to the wreckage we see today.
    "I was blinded by ideology," Frank is quoted as having whined before switching back into attack-dog mode and laying the blame for the fiasco on the very financial institutions his racist policies forced into their shotgun wedding with "subprime" mortgagees; i.e., people who could never and would never be able to repay their loans.

    Here's some relevant commentary:

November 1, 2011, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg addressing the Occupy Wall Street mob

"It was not the banks that created the mortgage crisis. It was, plain and simple, Congress, who forced everybody to go and give mortgages to people who were on the cusp. ...They were the ones who pushed Fannie and Freddie *** to make a bunch of loans that were imprudent, if you will."

2003, Barney Frank

"I do not want the same kind of focus on safety and soundness [in the regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac] that we have in the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision. I want to roll the dice a little bit more..."

October 20, 2010, Syndicated Columnist Tom Sowell,

"You would be hardpressed to find a politician who is less frank than U.S. Rep. Barney Frank. Even in an occupation where truth and candor are often lacking, Frank is in a class by himself when it comes to rewriting history in creative ways...No one contributed more to the policies behind the housing boom and bust, which led to the economic disaster we are now in, than Barney Frank. His powerful position on the House Committee on Financial Services gave him leverage to force through legislation and policies that pressured banks and other lenders to grant mortgage loans to people who would not qualify under the standards that had long prevailed, and had long made mortgage loans among the safest investments around.".

November 12, 2011, John Hinderaker, Powerline

"If there is a single face of the financial crisis, it is probably Barney Frank, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s chief Congressional patron, who shouted down all warnings and resisted all efforts to bring those agencies under control."

2004, Rep. Barney Frank

"I believe that we, as the federal government, have probably done too little rather than too much to push them [the banks] to meet the goals of affordable housing...I would like to get Fannie and Freddie more deeply into helping low-income housing."

September 20, 1999, Stephen Holmes, New York Times

"Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people...In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's.‘From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,’ said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ‘If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.’"

2003, Barney Frank, (when asked if taxpayers might have to bail out Fannie and Freddie in the event of a meltdown)

"There is no guarantee [of a Federal bailout]...there is no explicit guarantee, there is no implicit guarantee, there is no wink-and-nod guarantee."

December 30, 2009, John Hinderaker, Powerline

"When a private citizen like Bernie Madoff commits fraud, he gets a long jail sentence. But when Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, and the well-connected (and now rich) Democrats who headed Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae commit fraud ─ on a far larger scale ─ they simply send the bill to the taxpayers. Or, rather, the taxpayers' children."

    Barney Frank is the most reprehensible and disgusting excuse for a human being that has ever been voted into office by a blind, ignorant, partisan, and bigoted electorate.

Norm Mack, Peterborough, dog@myfairpoint.net

* For the record, I don’t watch the assholes that infest evening television.─ O’Reilly, Schultz, Hannity, Maddow, O‘Donnell, Schieffer, Cooper, and the other bullshit artists who make money spewing claptrap about things of which they know less than nothing for an audience that is even more ignorant than they are. An exception to my boycott is Keith Olbermann whom I watch for a minute or two now and then (I don’t have the stomach for longer sojourns) to keep abreast of what American Nazis are up to.

** In 1989 Frank was living with one Steve Gobie, a male homosexual prostitute who practiced his profession from Frank's apartment. When the matter came to light, Frank claimed he had no knowledge that his home was being used as a brothel. Right. And O. J. Simpson didn’t kill his wife, Bill Clinton never had sex with Monica Lewinsky, the Holocaust never happened, and Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus..

*** Fannie and Freddie are short for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which in turn are nicknames for the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, respectively. Both are quasi governmental bodies that underpin the mortgage market and whose collapse in 2008 cost American taxpayers between $100 billion and $300 billion depending on which book-cooking federal agency you choose to believe. ($95 million of those tax dollars went to lucrative pay packages for the firms' top executives )

Sneaky Nonsense

  I received an E-mail from one M. Sanjayan who describes himself or herself as lead scientist with The Nature Conservancy, an environmental organization to which I contribute a few bucks each year.
    The purpose of Mr., Miss, Mrs., or Ms. Sanjayan’s communiqué was to supply me and, I assume, the Conservancy’s million-plus members with a link to my "Very Own Sneak Preview" of how the group has been rescuing American forests and flood plains from commercial exploitation and the proliferation of the human species in places it doesn’t belong.
    In any event, the word "Sneak" combined with the word "Preview" kicked off a long-repressed train (or cargo ship) of thought in my few remaining gray cells:

What the hell is Sneaky about an event that is being broadcast far and wide to anybody and everybody?

    Answer me that, will you?
    You say you don’t give a shit?
    Well that’s just the kind of head-in-the-sand ostrich attitude that results in the proliferation of feral hogs in Florida and the election of Nancy Pelosi to Congress.

                                                                
* * *

    Although the origins of the phrase "Sneak Preview" are lost in the mists and three-martini lunches of Madison Avenues past. I believe (correct me if I’m mistaken) that its first usage emerged from the primordial slime of some unknown marketer’s tiny brain back in the 1960s.
    I’m sure you all remember the ‘60s ─ Elvis and the Beatles were ascendant, sex was being invented by teenage mutants at a three-day pot-fest at Max Yasgur's farm near Woodstock, New York; the nation was being Greened with LSD by Timothy Leary and kindred assholes, and mass nonconformity via advanced hair styling was sweeping the world.
    Since I am congenitally not with it, I was puzzled at the time ─ as, indeed, I still am ─ over why events that are massively advertised on radio, television, the internet, and the print media are billed as "Sneak."
    Used as an adjective, thesauruses (thesauri?) list "Sneak" as synonymous with "Secret," "Clandestine," "Furtive," and "Stealthy." Dictionaries define the word as "Perpetrated without warning" and "Marked by quiet and caution and secrecy."
    Examples of usage include Sneak Thief, Sneak Attack, and Sneak Affair. In other words, the exact opposite of its usage in the phrase "Sneak Preview."
    Like, suppose Al Qaeda had followed the Hollywood Sneak Preview formula prior to September 11, 2001: Here are some of the headlines and TV announcements we could have expected in the months preceding:

● Sneak Atrocity Preview to be broadcast to the Muslim world September 11 via Al Jazeera cable channel 666! Observe with ecstasy as Islamic fanatics crash airliners into Twin Towers for no reason! Thrill to the sights and sounds of Holy Warriors killing themselves and thousands of unbelievers! Rejoice as infidels die in agony. Catch the action live in flaming color and surround sound! Allahu Akbar!

● Sneak Jihad coming to you next month courtesy of Taliban TV! Giggle as Muslim lunatics destroy Twin Towers...delight as Islam heroes crash into Pentagon...See Arab martyrs ascend to heaven and have sex with Virgins!

● Exclusive Sneak Preview of terrorist attack to be aired 9/11 on CBS: Be amazed at collapsing skyscrapers! Listen to innocent victims scream as they die in flames! Be horrified as Dan Rather "Speaks Truth to Power" while he explains how President Bush is murdering American office workers!

    Or what if the Japs had advertised their coming Sneak Attack on Pearl Harbor with a massive media Sneak Preview blitz in the months leading up to December 7, 1941:

● Sneak Attack Preview Coming to your Rocal Theater December 7: Raugh and Cheer as Imperial Air Force Annihirate America Freet, Eriminate many Roundeyes!

● Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere to Raunch Pearl Harbor Sneak Attack December 7! Do Not Miss once in rifetime surprise event!

● Be sure to tune to Radio Nippon next Sunday! Risten to Sneak Japan Sordiers Sink Batterships, Destroy Airpranes, Brow up Civirians!

    Or the Navy Seals offing of Osama Bin Laden:

● President Obama went on national television today to announce a Sneak Preview of the assassination of terrorist Osama Bin Laden next Wednesday at his home in Abbottabad, Pakistan. Sneak live television coverage will begin 1 p.m. Eastern Standard Time with the boarding of Secret Black Hawk helicopters by an elite Sneak Force of Navy hitmen.

● The New York Times has learned that Muslim activist, Osama Bin Laden, will be featured in a Sneak Assassination Preview May 2 when a Sneak Team of Special Sneak Forces will kill him. Unidentified sources say Mr. Bin Laden’s bullet-riddled corpse will be dumped at sea in traditional Mohammedan fashion after he has been gunned down like a dog.

    Or Israel’s raid on Entebbe:

● In late-breaking news, Al Jazeera has been informed by Israeli Defense Forces that a Sneak Preview of a clandestine Jew operation will take place next week (July 4, 1976) to transport a hundred or so Sneak Zionist pig tourists from Entebbe airport in Uganda to the Zionist entity in contravention of international law.

● Speaking at a Texas-style roast pregnant woman barbecue June 28, beloved Ugandan President-for-Life Idi Amin invited his remaining countrymn to visit Entebbe next week to enjoy a Sneak Preview of a secret commando raid by Israeli Special Forces. After the scheduled Sneak Fiasco has engulfed the Ugandan army His Majesty will stage a Sneak Massacre of Ugandan civilians. Bring your own mashed plantain and banana wine! Don’t miss the fun!

Norm Mack, Sneak Blogger, Peterborough, dog@myfairpoint.net

Future Criminals of America ─ A New Inner City Youth Organization

    On November 11, 2011 (one of the few dates in the 21st Century during which nobody predicted that the World would end) an article datelined Montclair, NJ, appeared in the Manchester Union Leader and web sites and newspapers across this great land.

Teacher could be fired for Comments on Facebook

    As the story goes, New Jersey Administrative Judge Ellen Bass scathingly denounced one Jennifer O’Brien, a first grade teacher in the Paterson, NJ, school system, for demonstrating "a complete lack of sensitivity to the world in which her students live."
    Her Honor (I’ve never understood why judges are endowed with the title "Honor" considering that most of them are arrogant, overpaid, gutless, doctrinaire drones) was outraged by a critique of her budding young scholars that Ms. O’Brien posted on her Facebook page last March.. "I’m not a teacher," she had written to her Facebook friends, "I’m a warden for future criminals."
    The news article went on to suggest that Jennifer’s pique may have been occasioned by some past pranks played on her by her youthful charges that included assault and theft.
    Extenuating circumstances or no, and despite her 13 years in the instruction business, the authorities (none of whom, I venture to hazard, had ever brushed shoulders with inner city denizens) determined that Ms. O’Brien was insufficiently sensitive to realize that inner city boys will be inner city boys and inner city girls will be inner city girls.
    Judge Bass (who is no relation to the fish) went on to recommend that Ms. O’Brien be booted from her tenured position for her extreme lack of sensitivity as well as for the high crime of telling the truth. Moreover, since Patterson is a "poor, urban New Jersey community with a high rate of violent crime" school officials, and, no doubt, the Honorable Bass, interpreted O’Brien’s quasi tweet as racially tinged.
    Oh My Goodness Gracious! How dreadfully insightful of these educators to realize that if someone refers to "future criminals" in a poor, urban New Jersey community with a high rate of violent crime she is actually employing code for (dare I utter the dread words) the African-American Community?
    How dare she!
    As though African-Americans are the ones clogging the courts and jails of America in numbers completely out of proportion to their share of the population when everyone knows it’s those lawless Buddhists and Hindus and Wall street bankers that are responsible for all that mugging and drug dealing and murder.
    Like how non-PC can a grade school teacher get!
    Oh gosh, I’m so shaken by Ms. O’Brien’s insensitivity and inappropriateness that I’m gonna have to load up on some beer and chill out for a few hours with the Giants-49ers and Pats-Jets games

* * *

    Well the fucking Giants once again managed to blow a game they should have won.
    Fortunately, Brady and the Pats mashed the Jets and their obese loudmouth of a coach, Rex Ryan, in the evening. So I guess it was a wash.
    Anyhow...back to New Jersey and such trivia as the erosion of the cerebral cortices of American men, women, and children by the brain-eating parasites of mainstream Liberalism and their judicial and media henchmen.

* * *

    In "1984," the book that broke the back of the Soviet Union, George Orwell described three Commandments that were emblazoned on the exterior of the Ministry of Truth:

WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

    These Commandments were the central slogans of the tyranny envisioned by Orwell, a dark world in which humanity was crushed beneath the suffocating weight of an all-powerful state led by the omnipotent, godlike dictator Big Brother.
    Paterson New Jersey’s hapless Jennifer O’Brien, like Orwell’s doomed hero Winston Smith, is in a 1984 of her own, as she is slowly crushed by the judicio-academic establishment that holds sway in this country.
    Her crime?
    She violated Liberalism’s most sacred Commandment:

TRUTH IS BIGOTRY

    If you are a teacher, a media figure, a politician, a preacher, or just an average nerd in a high-profile position you risk your career, your livelihood, your family’s well-being, and your physical safety should you dare speak Truth about an ever-growing catalogue of verboten subjects, among them race, sexuality, religion, and gender.
    It’s perfectly okay, according to the PC police, for a black man to smear an entire race as Jesse Jackson did...or for another Black, Al Sharpton, to foment a murderous race riot in Harlem or commit anti-white perjury concerning a lying slut named Tawana Brawley...or for a simpering faggot like Perez Hilton to blackball a naive Miss USA contestant because she was against gay marriage...or for a bigot like Obama’s beloved minister of hate, Jeremiah Wright, to preach "God damn America...or for a murderous lunatic like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to be an honored guest of Columbia University, lecture the student body, and enjoy dinner with a select few privileged undergraduates.
    But let the President of Harvard University {Lawrence Summers) ask whether genetic differences might play a role in the preponderance of men over women in science, and a mass case of the vapors immediately afflicts the entire female faculty, followed by Summers’ forced resignation.
    Or let poor Jimmy the Greek muse that the preponderance of great black running backs in the NFL might be traceable to genetic selection dating back to slavery, and he is tarred, feathered, drummed out of the media, and; banished to the outer darkness for the rest of eternity.
    Or invite a conservative like Ann Coulter or a wishy-washy Republican like George Bush to speak at a college, and the university bureaucracy immediately morphs into tizzy mode followed either by a disinvite "based on security considerations" or else a paternalistic "naughty naughty" if a left-wing student sheep-mob riots on the orders of its sheepdog masters.

* * *

    In an article I posted several weeks ago, Tom Sowell wrote "Our schools are already too lacking in the basics of education to squander even more time on propaganda for politically correct causes that are in vogue."
    Tom, I love you. You’re one of the few islands of decency and sanity remaining in the world of intellect. But you’re wasting your breath with such advice.
    That ship has sailed.
    The Fascists are in control.
    The sad truth is that the population, the great mass of Americans if you will, does not understand that Fascism is not a matter of Left Wing or Right Wing, of Democrat or Republican.
    Mussolini and Stalin and Hitler and Castro and Peron and Mao were all cut from the same cloth.
    Fascism is a state of mind.
    Fascism has nothing to do with politics ─ with socialism, with conservatism, with communism, with anarchism, with nazism.

The common denominator of all Fascists is their craving for control

    And, today, in my beautiful country, the country in which I was so fortunate to be born, the Fascist Spirit, the spirit of subjugation and repression, grows ever stronger; the spirit of free thought ─ and of Truth itself ─ weaker and weaker.

Norm Mack, Peterborough, dog@myfairpoint.net

Hurricanes, Gay Marriage, Grammar, and Money

    Envy, and its green-eyed conjoined twin Jealousy, are prominent among the Seven Deadly Sins presented so eloquently by Dante Alighieri in The Divine Comedy.
    Envy is the itch to grab for oneself something of value that somebody else possesses (like a boyfriend, a lobster-salad sandwich, or an iPad).
    Jealousy, is the desire to strip from another something of value regardless of whether you want it for yourself or not (like a boyfriend, a lobster-salad sandwich, or an iPad).
    Many of the world’s woes, especially the internecine warfare waged by Out-Groups against In-Groups, can be laid at the feet of these human but reprehensible sins.
    Let’s spell out the characteristics and nature of Out-Groups and In-Groups so that we’ll know what we’re talking about. 

 

 

● An Out-Group is a subset of humanity that either Envies certain perceived Assets that an opposing subset, the In-Group, is believed to have or else works to strip the opposing subset of certain perceived Assets of which the Out-Group is Jealous.
● Out-Groups need not be Minorities nor do In-Groups need to be Majorities. For example Females (an Out-Group majority) vs. males (an In-Group Minority). Similarly, the so-called Underdeveloped World (an Out-Group majority) vs. the Developed World (an In-Group Minority).
● A significant factor is that whether or not the perceived Assets that an Out-Group craves are genuinely valuable has little to do with the intensity of the Out-Group’s passion to possess them.
● To sum up, the one constant in the whole affair is that Out-Groups, like children, want whatever they don’t have regardless of the importance, merit, or objective worth of the objects of their desire.

    Here are some current examples of the Out-Group/In-Group dichotomy.

Gay Marriage (Homosexual Out-Group Vs. Heterosexual In-Group)
    As all but the comatose know, the gay community has been hissy fitting for a decade or more over the non-burning issue of same-sex marriage.
    For reasons that neither gays nor straights nor any sane human being can comprehend, homosexual men and women are demanding the right to parade down the aisle in white chiffon and/or lavender tux, swear ever-lasting fealty to their sex partner of the moment, and immediately become entangled in the hellish legal web that has been plaguing the heterosexual community (or as New Yorker magazine would say, the heterosexual "institution") for centuries.
    Are starry-eyed gay couples aware that the right to marriage comes hand in glove (or foot in mouth) with the right to divorce?
    I mean it’s wrenching enough to split with someone you’ve been screwing for a month or a year or ten years without having to cough up a hefty tithe to the courts and the lawyers when one or both of you get tired of the same old same old.
    But what the hell.
    None of that matters. The Out-Group wants what the In-Group has, no matter how pointless or disastrous. That’s what she wrote and that’s all she wrote.

Hurricane Names (Female and African-American Out-Groups Vs. White Male In-Group)
    Once upon a time hurricanes were named after girls ─ Suzie and JoAnn and Beatrice and so forth. The supply was endless what with all the different possible spellings. I mean, like, Caitlin alone could supply several hurricane seasons with Kaitlyn, Kaitlin, Katelin, Katelyn, Catelyn, Caitlyn, Kaytlin, Kaytlin, and Caytlyn.
    Alas, the activist class ─ led by such stalwart harridans as Betty Frieden (who is still alive). Bella Abzug (who is dead, but is expected to rise from the grave at any moment), Erica Jong (who is currently in a clinic for the terminally asinine), and Gloria Steinem (who graduated from ignoble bunnyhood into radical bitchhood) ─ marched on Washington shortly after the bra-burning epidemic of the ‘60s and forced the weather bureau to include boy names such as Bruce and Hugo.
    Apparently this coup did so much to advance the cause of woman’s lib and world peace (as well as draw attention to the fact that topnotch female editorial assistants were paid far less than mediocre major league outfielders), that leaders of the African-American Out-Group are demanding that Black names be included in the hurricane roster.
    So all you white bigots out there, better brace yourself for the next hurricane season. Duwayne, Tyrone, Tonisha, Plaxico, Woopie, Shaquandra, and Tawana are on the way.
    Uh-Oh...I just got word that the Arabs want Anwar and Osama added, the Jews want Moshe and Hyman, the illegal- aliens are demanding Diego, Jose, Encarnacion, and Manuela, and the Thais threaten a boycott of American goods if Sukhon, Ngam-Chit, Phassakorn, and Khemkhaeng aren’t included.
    Y’know, I just thought of something. The female Out-Group wanted male names included because using female-only names was insulting to women. But Blacks want African-American names included because not using Black names is insulting to Blacks.
    See what I mean? It’s all such crap. The fact is that Out-Groups don’t give a shit whether what they want makes any sense. They merely want whatever they think the supposed In-Group has.

Miss, Mrs, and Ms (Female Out-Group Vs. Male In-Group)
    On or about the time that activist women were demanding non-equal representation in the nomenclature of tropical storms, other activist ladies were focusing on gender discrimination implicit in the area of titles.
    Why, they asked, should the marital status of females be identified by the labels Miss and Mrs. while males got off scot free with a universal "Mr."
    Why, indeed? The solution was clear to the avant garde. A third modifier must be created that could proudly stand alongside "Mr." on the podium of life leaving everyone unsure of the marital status of double-X homo sapiens sharing the dais.
    Thus "Ms." (pronounced "Miz" for some reason) made its appearance on the world stage forcing 90 percent of the male population as well as Rosie O'Donnell and Ellen DeGeneres to glance at a chick’s ring finger before hitting on her.
    And so today’s liberated woman is now blessed with three titles to choose from rather than two. However, outside of spicing things up (rather like having a choice of dress-style, shoes, lingerie, hand bags, and hair-dos), it is hard to see just how the introduction of "Ms." improved the lot of the average housewife, career girl, or unwed welfare mother.
    Moreover, if by some historical quirk men had happened to be identified as, say, Mouster for single men and Munsteroo for married men and women had been identified simply by Mosh, you can be sure that female activists would have demanded equivalent sobriquets for themselves, say Moshamoiselle and Muasha.

Equal Opportunity Grammar (Female Out-Group Vs. Male In-Group)
    My friend from Reader’s Digest, Sally French (I hope she’ll still be my friend after this post), introduced what I call equal opportunity grammar to the Digest when she was editor of such massive best sellers as How to Do Just About Anything, Practical Problem Solver, and Household Hints and Handy Tips. (Our redoubtable art director, David Trooper, liked to call the last of these volumes, "Household Hints and Handy Tits.")
    At the time, I was in charge of the company’s line of instructional books (Law, Cooking, How-to, Gardening) and stirred myself sufficiently to review the progress of one of the books Sally was putting together. What I discovered was that she was employing the pronouns "he" and "she" randomly throughout the text. Thus on one page the reader might be advised to "See your plumber, he will solve the problem," and several pages later the reader might be advised to "See your plumber, she will solve the problem."
    I don’t know what to say about this sort of thing except to note that these dancing pronouns make me vaguely uncomfortable ─ not so much because they violate hoary grammatical convention, but rather because I found I was continually having to re-image the book’s anonymous plumbers and other characters to suit the shifting whim of the editor 
    I should point out that the reinvention of conventions is seldom a good idea. I also wonder if traditionally female objects ─ like ships and cars and cats ─ are positives or negatives in the view of the weaker, I mean stronger, sex.
    In conclusion, let me ask if it really improved the lot of the world’s majority type of human being when the poetic meter of the somewhat ungrammatical Star Trek intro was ruined by changing "To boldly go where no man has gone before" to the insipid "To boldly go where no one has gone before?"

Gimme Your Money (Third World Out-Group Vs. Developed World In-Group)
    Unlike the other cases I’ve listed, there is a modicum of logic to the demands by the poorer nations of the world to get their hands on as much of the wealthier nation’s money as they can.
     Rather than calling this Thievery, the process is usually referred to as "Reparations" since it is accepted Liberal doctrine that America, Australia, Canada, and most of Western Europe are wealthy only because they stole the resources of the other nations of the world and enslaved their populations. (For reasons I do not understand, Japan, Finland, Sweden, and Monaco are exempt from these charges.)
    Now, I certainly agree that the average Ugandan and Zimbabwean man or woman in the bush is entitled to live as well as, say, Yoko Ono and Susan Sarandon.
    But what about me?
    I mean, hell, I’m kinda like a small underdeveloped nation myself and I want, in fact I DEMAND, that Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, George Soros, Sean Penn, Barbra Streisand, Michael Moore and all the rest of them there fat cats cough over a few million bucks of their loot to me without delay.
    What’s more, I don’t give a shit if they claim they worked for it, inherited it, stole it, or won it in the lottery.
    I want half!
    And if they won’t give it to me nice-like, I’ll picket their damn homes and piss on their damn lawns and crap on their damn BMWs and then I’ll get on the horn and hire goddamn Barney Frank and have him legislate it away from them.
    So there!

Norm Mack, Peterborough, dog@myfairpoint.net

Mr. Editor: Are There Really Any Non-Mexican Aliens?

    Americans seem fascinated by the question of whether there is intelligent life elsewhere in the universe. Putting aside the dubious assumption that there is intelligent life on earth, the question must be split in two:
        1. Are there other lifeforms out there as brilliant as we humans?
        2. If there are such lifeforms, what are the chances that we’ll hear from them?
   The answer to the first question can be anything you choose ─ "Yes," "No," "Maybe," "Probably," "Definitely, "Whatever," "I don’t give a shit" ─ depending on what religion you subscribe to or how much grass you’ve smoked.
    As for the second question, "What are the chances that we’ll hear from them?" the answer is more straightforward: "Absolutely none."
    Granted, the universe (which as you may be aware is a very large place indeed) could easily be teeming with millions upon millions of high IQ alien civilizations sprinkled hither and yon amongst the few hundred trillion galaxies visible to the naked Hubble, each galaxy containing a few hundred trillion stars like our sun many of which are surrounded by cozy little solar systems like our own with small blue planets circling them on which Allah or Jehovah or Krishna or Dennis Kucinich or some other omnipotent being has ordained a cornucopia of life forms and put them under the supervision of ape-like mammals whose males wear Levi’s and whose females have a passion for designer handbags.
    The problem, however, isn’t whether superior carbon-based entities such as editors of the New York Times inhabit the far reaches of the cosmos ─ it’s whether we can expect to be texting with them on our iPads or iPhones or iPods one of these millennia.
    And that’s where that annoying son-of-a-bitch Einstein comes along to gum up the works and spoil the fun with that stupid dogma of his about nothing being able to travel faster than the speed of light.
    Albert is dead and not about to debate all you fans of Captain Kirk, Mr. Spock, Scottie, and Sulu, who know that all we need to do to speed up our phone calls is to switch into Warp Drive, point our Priuses toward the nearest Worm Hole, and jump into Hyperspace, so I’ll just content myself with pointing out that all of you trekkies are full of shit.

● There ain’t no such things as Worm Holes.
● There ain’t no such thing as Hyperspace.
● Warp Drive is a total crock.
● The velocity of light is 186,000 miles per second and nothing, not even Barney Frank’s tongue, can transmit information or saliva faster than that.
● Scottie's dead, Sulu’s doing commercials, Nimoy is writing bad poetry, and Shatner has abandoned his starship captaincy in favor of transforming himself into a human blimp.

    Live with it! That’s the way it is! It’s not up to you! You’re stuck with it already!
    The upshot? It doesn’t matter a tinker’s damn if you believe there are green pen pals out there with antennae and tentacles and multiple sex organs interested in tweeting attractive earth chicks because there’s not a Chinaman’s chance in hell that anyone will ever hear anything from any of them or that any of them will ever hear anything from any of us:
    It’s really very simple:
    There could be a gazillion super races flourishing throughout the universe or there could be none. We don’t know. We will never know. They’re all so fucking far away it would take longer than a geological age for their "Wish you were here" cards to show up in your E-mail.
    You got that?
    Can you wrap your mind around that?
                                                                
* * *
    
Oh...My...God!...
    You’ve discovered, based on incontrovertible evidence from the Syfy channel, several Steven Spielberg movies, your sister’s hairdresser, and your personal observation of a strange greenish bluish yellowish violetish light in the sky last Wednesday, that there are oodles of super-intelligent lifeforms in the vicinity of Betelgeuse and Messier 59,762 and that they’ve been busily messaging us and dropping by in their Toyota UFOs for centuries and that I’m a close-minded, pig-headed, atheist prick for denying it.
    Okay! Okay! Okay!.
    Sheesh!
    You win!
    I throw in the towel.
    I like totally, y’know, concede to your superior wisdomability and knowledgeableness and humbly grovel at your feet and beg to kiss your ass.
    What’s more I’m gonna go outside tonight and start sending smoke signals via my personal hyperspace worm hole to the nearest black hole I can find.
    I can’t wait to hear back. I just know something amazingly weird is waiting anxiously at the event horizon for my message. I hope it receives my dispatch before the cops show up and haul me away for polluting outer space.

Norm Mack, Peterborough, dog@myfairpoint.net

Tom Sowell on Bullying, Another Liberal Cause du Jour

            
                
                                      Thomas Sowell, senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at 
                                      Stanford University. His website is http://www.tsowell.com

(The following is an October 26, 2011, article by Dr. Thomas Sowell, one of the finest writers and most coherent intellects on the American scene today. He echoes my feelings about the media-fed, liberal-inspired anti-bullying frenzy that is currently all the rage in primary schools, secondary schools, and universities across the country.)

    BACK IN THE 1920s, the intelligentsia on both sides of the Atlantic were loudly protesting the execution of political radicals Sacco and Vanzetti, after what they claimed was an unfair trial.
    Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote to his young leftist friend Harold Laski, pointing out that there were "a thousand-fold worse cases" involving black defendants, "but the world does not worry over them."
    Holmes said: "I cannot but ask myself why this so much greater interest in red than black."
    To put it bluntly, it was a question of whose ox was gored. That is, what groups were in vogue at the moment among the intelligentsia. Blacks clearly were not.
    The current media and political crusade against "bullying" in schools seems likewise to be based on what groups are in vogue at the moment. For years, there have been local newspaper stories about black kids in schools in New York and Philadelphia beating up Asian classmates, some beaten so badly as to require medical treatment.
    But the national media hear no evil, see no evil and speak no evil. Asian Americans are not in vogue today, just as blacks were not in vogue in the 1920s.
    Meanwhile, the media are focused on bullying directed against youngsters who are homosexual. Gays are in vogue.
    Most of the stories about the bullying of gays in schools are about words directed against them, not about their suffering the violence that has long been directed against Asian youngsters or about the failure of the authorities to do anything serious to stop black kids from beating up Asian kids.
    Where youngsters are victims of violence, whether for being gay or whatever, that is where the authorities need to step in. No decent person wants to see kids hounded, whether by words or deeds, and whether the kids are gay, Asian or whatever.
    But there is still a difference between words and deeds — and it is a difference we do not need to let ourselves be stampeded into ignoring. The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States guarantees freedom of speech — and, like any other freedom, it can be abused.
    If we are going to take away every Constitutional right that has been abused by somebody, we are going to end up with no Constitutional rights.
    Already, on too many college campuses, there are vaguely worded speech codes that can punish students for words that may hurt somebody’s feelings — but only the feelings of groups that are in vogue.
    Women can say anything they want to men, or blacks to whites, with impunity. But strong words in the other direction can bring down on students the wrath of the campus thought police — as well as punishments that can extend to suspension or expulsion.
    Is this what we want in our public schools?
    The school authorities can ignore the beating up of Asian kids but homosexual organizations have enough political clout that they cannot be ignored. Moreover, there are enough avowed homosexuals among journalists that they have their own National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association — so continuing media publicity will ensure that the authorities will have to "do something."
    But political pressures to "do something" have been behind many counterproductive and even dangerous policies.
    A grand jury report about bullying in the schools of San Mateo County, Calif., brought all sorts of expressions of concern from school authorities — but no definition of "bullying" nor any specifics about just what they plan to do about it.
    Meanwhile, a law has been passed in California that mandates teaching about the achievements of gays in the public schools. Whether this will do anything to stop either verbal or physical abuse of gay kids is very doubtful.
    But it will advance the agenda of homosexual organizations and can turn homosexuality into yet another of the subjects on which words on only one side are permitted. Our schools are already too lacking in the basics of education to squander even more time on propaganda for politically correct causes that are in vogue. We do not need to create special privileges in the name of equal rights.
.
Norm Mack, Peterborough, dog@myfairpoint.net

Euro-Crap Revisited

    I posted an article last July that was outspokenly critical of the whole idea of a single European currency, of the bureaucratic mindset that led to its creation, and of the slow-motion economic catastrophe that was unfolding as a result. I blamed the genesis of the euro on the mean-spirited fairytales of Marxism, theories that continue to infect the dim cocktail-party minds of the intelligentsia.
    I don't claim any great credit for being prophetic ─ what was happening then, is happening now, and seems likely to happen in the future, is pretty damn obvious.
    Below are some relevant excerpts from my prior piece. For the entire article, click
Euro-Crap Original.

● What in God’s name possessed a clique of European bureaucrats to come up with the foolhardy idea of a single European currency?
● What possessed the member states of the European Community to buy into the madness?
● What kind of grass were they smoking when they imagined that 20 sovereign nations representing a bewildering mix of ethnic, sectarian, and racial groups, each with histories of warfare and conquest; subjugation and victory; bigotry, savagery, and hatred going back 5,000 years, could be welded into a unified superstate?
    There would be no Greek Crisis, Spanish Crisis, Irish Crisis, Portuguese Crisis, Italian Crisis, (and lord knows how many future crises) if those nations had their own free-floating currencies.
    If the citizens of Greece want to live in a welfare state consisting of two or three productive workers for every seven or eight government slugs ─ fine. Without the shackles of the euro, the Greek drachma could float downward to its proper level on the currency exchanges of the world and, should the population so desire, go the way of the Zimbabwe dollar which, when last heard from, was being issued in Z$100 trillion denominations.
    
The virtue of this scenario is that the economic well-being of other nations (including Germany, France, and the U. S.) wouldn’t be hostage to the vagaries of Greek street mobs....
    One can’t but wonder if the notoriously hard-working and thrifty citizens of Germany, having already donated a few hundred billion dollars to their Greek non-brethren, are going to continue to cough up their hard-earned bank deposits to bail out other profligate neighbors to the south.
    Throw Spain, Italy, and Portugal into the pot, sprinkle in a dash of Ireland, season with a few hundred billion euros for contingency, and voilà! ─ the Royal Bank of Scotland estimates that a mere €3.5 trillion ($5 trillion U. S.) slush fund would prevent the collapse of the euro for at least a year, maybe two.

Norm Mack, Peterborough, dog@myfairpoint.net 

Vanished in the Dust-Bin of Progress

    Columnist George Will pointed out that Liberals, having damaged liberalism’s reputation, are now calling themselves Progressives. Well...not to contradict the erudite Mr. Will (nor defend Liberals), I consider the term "Progressive" to be even less appealing than the term "Liberal."
    Progressive, I assume, means in favor of progress. Progress, I assume, means change. It’s fair to say that the country’s had almost three years of supposed Change (though not much Hope) under the Progressive leadership of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Barack (Hope and Change) Obama. And if you think things have been getting better and better I suggest you trot down to Zuccotti Park and tell all the youthful idealists there that they’re barking up the wrong trees and urinating on the wrong sidewalks.
    The plain truth is that Progress is almost always bad.

· Are our lives really better now that we drive ten miles to pick up our groceries at Walmart or Shaw’s rather than walk half a block to the corner grocery store?
· Does milk taste sweeter now that it’s in post-dated cardboard cartons or plastic jugs instead of bottles delivered fresh each morning to your doorstep?
· Is a weeks-old Saran-wrapped cylinder of amorphous dough really a healthier, tastier alternative to a warm, fresh-out-of-the-oven, preservative-free loaf of rye from the local baker?
· Are we more fulfilled now that the roses we buy on Mother’s Day are imported from Colombia and have no scent?
· Are our children’s lives richer now that they wear armor when they’re riding their bikes and are taken to playgrounds devoid of Jungle Gyms and Monkey Bars under the watchful eyes of helicopter parents?

    Cartoonist Roz Chast, that lone shining diamond in the fag-ridden fever swamp of New Yorker magazine, summons up remembrance of things past:

    

    I put together a table, strictly off the top of my head, of some of the things and activities that have vanished or are in the process of vanishing from our lives. A few, perhaps, such as fur coats, fedoras, and the typographers union that was so instrumental in decimating the newspaper business, are just as well dead and buried. The majority, however, represent incremental losses to the grace and richness and variety of daily existence. Here's my list. I'm sure you can think of items to add:

                                             Going...Going...Going...Gone......

BUSINESSES

THINGS

ACTIVITIES, JOBS, AND SERVICES

Travel agencies

Songs that are singable

Group singing at parties around the piano

Cigar stores

Egg creams

Schoolyard handball

Corner Grocers

Fresh butter

Washroom attendants

Shoe shine parlors

Home permanent kits

Soda jerks

Stationery stores

Fresh bread

Milk delivery*

Corner Bakeries

Dill pickles from the barrel

Brick layers*

Five and dime stores

Tricycles

Linotype operators*

Automats

Fur coats

Elevator operators*

Ice cream parlors

Fedoras, Homburgs, Straw Hats

Kids street and sidewalk games (Hopscotch, Red Rover, Stickball, Chinese handball, Ring-a-levio)

Photo developers

Bathing caps

Ad sections in newspapers and magazines for men and women seeking partners 

Butcher shops

Rubbers and galoshes

Employees of the Tongue River Clinic cat house in Miles City, Montana

Fish markets

Great old autos like Packard and Hudson and Studebaker

Listening to Jack Benny and Fred Allen and all the rest on a Sunday evening

Video rental stores

Slide rules

Hitchhiking across America with one valise and almost no money

Real hardware stores

Fountain pens

Staying in two-dollar-a-night hotel rooms

Newspaper kiosks

Slate blackboards

Dressing up for dinner in a good restaurant

Dry cleaners

Stephen Foster songs

Kids going barefoot in the summer

Full service gas stations

Fresh ripe peaches

 

Haberdasheries

Fresh ripe tomatoes

 

Print shops

Boys in shorts and knickers

 

Book stores

Most newspapers*  
*Hurried to the graveyard by unions

    I'm a sentimental slob and I hope you'll forgive me, but when I look back on the past, on those childhood days of sunshine and shadow and stickball and skinned knees and Stenick's corner grocery and old Seltzer's candy store near P.S. 150, I can't help thinking of an old song called When You and I Were Young, Maggie.

I wandered today to the hill, Maggie,
To watch the scene below -
The creek and the creaking old mill, Maggie,
As we used to, long ago.
The green grove is gone from the hill, Maggie,
Where first the daisies sprung;
The creaking old mill is still, Maggie,
Since you and I were young.

Norm Mack, Peterborough, dog@myfairpoint.net

Mobs

    In my post, The God Gene, I wrote that there is a specific gene, a Darwinian adaptation, that predisposes members of our species to believe in non-existent entities called Gods. I also ventured that the God Gene was a key factor in mankind’s penchant for banding into competing packs under the banner of one religion or another.
    Over the ages, the implications of the God Gene have been a mixed bag. Clearly, it has played a vital role in man’s domination of the natural world. Unfortunately, it has also had the side effect of inspiring devotees of one imaginary being to spend their lives working to convert or dominate devotees of differing imaginary beings through such time-honored stratagems as pillage, rape, war, starvation, enslavement, and mass murder.
    I also noted that I was one of a small number of mutants who lacked the God Gene.
                                                                *   *   *
    Lately, I’ve discovered another serious chromosomal deficit in my makeup...Apparently I not only lack a God Gene, but I do not have a Mob Gene either.
    The Mob Gene, for those who may not be hip to its existence, is the DNA unit responsible for so much good-natured group fun over the centuries ─ from ancient Rome’s Fickle Crowd (Mobile Vulgus from which the word Mob derives) and Genghis Khan’s Golden Horde to the street mobs of the French Revolution to our own Salem Witch Trials to the Nuremberg rallies of Nazi Germany to the mud fields of Woodstock to the siege of the U.S. embassy in Teheran to the television-deprived blacks of Watts-riot fame to Britain’s recent redistribution of electronic goods via smashed store windows.
    But, as is so often the case in this exciting, facebook-enhanced, iPhone-driven, twitterized world of ours, it is the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA that has proudly pioneered the way to a dramatic new form of Mob ─ The Mob Without a Cause!
    Participants in the Occupy Whatever The Fuck You Happen To Think Of movement that are currently rooting like swine in their self-created filth in urban centers throughout the planet point out that they are both VERY ANGRY and VERY IDEALISTIC.
    Well shit, I’m VERY ANGRY too. I was born angry and the older I get the angrier I get. In fact I think I’m angrier than any of them there Occupy Whatever fuckers. And what’s more I’m so god-awful idealistic I can barely spit. But you don’t see me camping out in front of Peterborough Town Hall with a bunch of fellow geriatric cases, smoking crack cocaine, chanting slogans about Hitler and Mao, and crapping into the marigold containers.
    Hell No! 
    When I’m pissed off (which is always), I just barge into my wife’s room after dinner and start venting some of my pent-up hatred. And when she kicks me out (as she will) because she’s engrossed in a 550-pound tumor or Rosie O’Donnell flapping her sagging tits on OWN and is sick of my bitching anyway, I just go outside and run in circles around the big white pine tree until I turn into a pool of butter.
    One thing about the Mob Gene, however, distinguishes it from the God Gene...unlike the God Gene, other members of the animal kingdom also possess the Mob Gene, most famously lemmings, sheep, and cows.
    All it takes is one activist Border Collie to get the herd moving from its lush pastureland (or parents’ basement) to the slaughterhouse (or New York City financial district). A few nips on a few leg tendons, some strategic barks of command (with or without loudspeaker), and the flock gallops off to its appointed destination, there to bleat and defecate until the authorities arrive with hoses, pepper spray, and a New York Times reporter.
    All-in-all a well-wrought mob makes a beautiful spectacle...and even more beautiful is the exultation stirred in the breasts and testicles of its participants.
    In what other venue than a mob can a human being so completely shed the onerous shackles of civilization and enjoy the red hot freedom of anonymity? Where else can one’s every action, no matter how destructive, unsanitary, or mindless, be legitimatized by simply immersing oneself in an all-concealing mass of fellow ovines, bovines, and assholes?
    A mob confers invisibility, you see, which is the greatest freedom of all. And along with invisibility comes liberation ─ liberation from responsibility... liberation from accountability... liberation from rational thought.
    Embedded in the bosom of the mob, encouraged by its roars and chants, obedient only to the will of its sheepdog master, the mob member can at long last indulge in all those long-denied, wonderful, half-forgotten animal pleasures of childhood ─ hatred, vandalism, theft, taunting, arson, rock-throwing, bigotry, tantrums, threats, irrational whining, pointless demands.
    What then is the hapless non-mob participant to do as the mob luxuriates in its primeval joys of intellectual atavism, physical filth, legal immunity, and the right to commit random violence?
    Here’s my take on it for what it’s worth:

Suppose it’s St Patrick’s Day and you run into a rolling mob of drunken Irishmen. You have two options ─ get out of the way or get shoved into the gutter.

    There ain’t nothing else in the refrigerator, friends.

Norm Mack, Peterborough, dog@myfairpoint.net

For Christ’s Sake Already

    Those stalwart guardians of the public weal and our freedom ─ the New York Times, the Washington Post, the families of dead terrorists, Texas Representative Ron Paul, and law-abiding mass-murder clubs like Al-Qaeda ─ are Shocked!...Shocked! that a gentle AMERICAN CITIZEN named Anwar al-Awlaki and his even-gentler AMERICAN CITIZEN comrade in peace, Samir Khan, were recently incinerated by an American drone. (After which they were transported by a covey of angels to Muslim Heaven, there to dwell in everlasting sexual intercourse with a boundless supply of cute little virgins.)

                 
            Anwar Al Awlaki (L) and Samir Khan, murdered Sept. 30 by an unconstitutional drone 

    What savage outlaws we Americans have become, obliterating two AMERICAN CITIZENS as they were happily driving around the lush Yemeni countryside enjoying their hard-earned vacations abroad (seven years for Anwar, three years for Samir). Can you believe the phony, trumped up pretexts for killing these two dedicated citizens? Waging war against the United States? Arranging for the murder of random American citizens? Working with terrorists to turn the world clock backward a thousand years so that humanity could again wallow in the bliss of a Muslim caliphate under the benevolent protection of all-knowing Imams like Anwar himself? It is to laugh.
    What is wrong with us as a people?
    How have we fallen so low as to equate the trivial lives of a few hundred, or a few thousand, or a few hundred thousand Americans with the beauty of living in a brave new world of Sharia where women, as in times of old, will once again enjoy the heartwarming luxury of slavery and where men will experience the soul-cleansing thrill of prostrating themselves ten or twenty times a day with their assholes aimed toward Mecca?
    By what right does our government see fit to ignore our constitution as interpreted by learned academicians, brave legislative weirdoes, and magisterial media conglomerates that have devoted their lives to subverting that very constitution and to destroying the fabric of the country where they live and work?
    I for one (or two or three) am absolutely outraged at such high-handed flouting of legal precedent. American citizens (if not foreigners) have every right to be exonerated before a jury of their peers no matter how vile the crimes they have committed. And if they don’t want to come home to face trial, why...why...why...it’s...it's...just not nice!
    Ron Paul, that great legal mind and exemplar of tolerance, patience, morality, and constitutionality, has called for impeachment of the President or the attorney general or their lawyers or whomever he can think of. How dare we defend ourselves against our enemies, he muses, against traitors, against mass murderers, against psychopathic religious fanatics when they are AMERICAN CITIZENS? If they were British or Chinese or German or Maori it would be okay he seems to suggest. But AMERICANS? Outrageous!
    My Gawd! this entire affair reeks of horrid memories of lawless Israelis violating Argentine sovereignty by kidnapping Adolf Eichmann or brazenly interfering in the internal affairs of Uganda to transport a few useless Kikes back to their homeland.
    As Congressman Paul and many other outstanding American thinkers and constitutional experts so aptly point out, the entire matter could have been solved with a simple, polite iPhone text message to Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh (now that he’s back from his three-month holiday in a Saudi Arabian hospital) humbly requesting the return of the vacationing pair of gentle American Muslims to the United States on misdemeanor charges of inappropriate behavior and failing to register their motor scooters.
    Such a civilized, commonsense action would have solved the entire matter in a trice in accord with any number of constitutional amendments and international protocols. And if there was any subsequent difficulty, we could have brought the matter to the attention of the United Nations. No doubt Russia, China, the Arabs, and our friends throughout the Muslim World would have leapt at the chance to support us.
    As a further gesture of good will, if the peace-loving Yemenis had any qualms about our motives, it would have been an easy matter to assure them that the trial would take place in California before the same judge and jury that handled the O. J. Simpson case so brilliantly.

    
All right. Enough heavy-handed sarcasm.

1. It’s glaringly obvious that the New York Times is pulling out all the stops in hopes of somebody or other leaking a memo that will claim our government is evil, thereby securing yet another Pulitzer for the Newspaper of Record and its staff of traitors.
2. Ron Paul is not only a bigot, but a fucking idiot as well.
3. If a man chooses to dress up like a bit character from one of Woody Allen’s lesser comedies and spend his time on earth plotting to murder his fellow human beings, he should be wiped off the face of planet.
4. If some brainless, hate-filled young jackass worships such an insane creep and spends his time on earth doing the madman’s bidding, then he too should be executed like the savage beast he is.

    What it boils down to is this: If someone attempts to kill one of my children, I’ll blow his fuckin’ brains out if I can get the drop on him.
    And the New York Times can go straight plumb to hell.

Norm Mack, Peterborough, dog@myfairpoint.net

Life's a Slippery Business

Quote of the Week

GALVESTON, Tex. Dec. 8, 1964 (UPI)—Maj. Claude R. Eatherly, 46 years old, who blamed the atom bombing of Hiroshima for his troubles, was adjudged insane today by a District Court jury.
    The jury deliberated only 14 minutes before deciding to have Eatherly committed to Rusk State Hospital for an indefinite period.
    A jury was selected in less than four hours in Judge L. L. Godard’s District Court on a motion by Eatherly’s attorneys that he should be put in a psychiatric hospital.
    Eatherly was indicted on charges that he tried to hold up a motel and tried to rob a supermarket in September. The motel robbery netted $10.
    Eatherly flew a reconnaissance weather plane that scouted the bombing of Hiroshima by the B-29 Enola Gay in 1945. He had nothing to do with the bombing.
    Since the war, Eatherly has been in jail eight times and in mental hospitals at least 10 times.
    He said he had bad dreams from the bombings.
    "I see great fires, boiling fires, crimson fires, closing in on me. Buildings fall, children run — living torches with their clothes aflame."
This article appeared in the New York Times in 1964. I clipped it and saved it. Eatherly was 26 or 27 when he flew the mission

Chart of the Week


                         (Click to enlarge)

Correct Me If I'm Wrong, But...

*** I’ve been inserting a Facebook plug-in on my posts for the past few months, but as far as I can tell nobody gives a fuck so I’m going to stop bothering.
    Not sure what this implies with regard to Facebook’s future profitability and, therefore, its IPO value ─ I, personally, do not understand how the company, despite its vast audience, can become another Google-like gold mine. On the other hand (or foot or kidney) I felt the same about Amazon.com when it first went public.
    A negative vote from Norm Mack may be a signal to investors everywhere to buy, buy, buy.


***Yet another stunning page-one pronouncement from the New York Times, this one courtesy of food activist Mark Bittman.
    Under the banner "School Breakfast, the New Food Fight" the following subhead pins the proverbial tail on the well-known donkey’s ass::

       We should work
       to prevent hunger
       and obesity

        Wow!
        Them’s fightin’ words, Mark!
        That’ll put the lie to all those meat-eating, right-wing neo-Nazi homophobes who want to starve our children to death by making them as fat as Walmart mothers-in-law.
        T
    hank God for the fearless New York Times and their brave columnists!

    ***Funny...I can't figure it out...
        Ever since the Super Bowl I've had this unaccountable urge to rush out and buy a Fiat 500 Abarth.

        FYI: The incredibly gorgeous girl in the video is 26-year-old Romanian model Catrinel Menghia.
        Here's a translation of what she's saying (courtesy Autoevolution.com):

            What are you looking at, Huh!?
            What are you looking at?! (slap)
            Are you undressing me with your eyes?
            Poor guy…you can’t help it.
            Is your heart beating? Is your head
            spinning?
            Do you feel lost thinking that I could be
            yours forever?

    ***A few days ago the Los Angeles Times was handed 18 photographs of American soldiers posing with the remains of dead Taliban and generally behaving like barbarian swine. The Pentagon requested the pictures not be published because they might incite Moslem rioting. The Times published.
        I believe the paper was justified. That’s what a free press is supposedly about.
        As the editors put it ─ after acknowledging the likelihood that the photos would inflame anti-American feeling ─ "At the end of the day, our job is to publish information that our readers need to make informed decisions."
        In 2005, the Los Angeles Times refused to publish some rather innocuous Danish cartoons depicting Mohammed that had inspired a typical murderous Islamic spree. The Times justified the censorship by saying the drawings might incite Moslem rioting.
        Is there a more perfect example of the hypocrisy and cowardice that characterizes American media?
        The Los Angeles Times did not publish the Mohammed cartoons because the editors were terrified they would become targets of Moslem retaliation. .
        They did publish the Taliban photos because they knew the U. S. military wouldn’t retaliate.
        How proud the Times reporters and editors must be as they look forward to another Pulitzer in recognition of their intrepid reportage.
        Journalism is a profession of whores.

    ***I don’t know about you, but I’m bloody well sick of all the liberal crap being vomited from Washington about Wall Street this and Wall Street that and Wall Street sucks and Wall Street is stealing money from all us good, hard-working, unemployed Americans.
        For Chrissake already, Wall Street is a fucking street, and a narrow one at that with traffic restricted to emergency vehicles and residents of the White House. It is not a Scroogy old man with pince-nez gloating over his hoard of gold and plotting how to rob the 99% of their hard-earned unemployment checks. That would be Warren Buffet or Barbra Streisand.

     
     Evil ca;pitalist swine (left), attractive capitalist swine
     (right0. Neither is Wall Street. Note pince-nez, however.


        Face it ─ Wall Street is paved in asphalt, has concrete sidewalks, its gutters contain a traditional New York City display of trash, and I can assure you from personal experience, that there is not a mean bone in its body.
        But none of that is going to stop Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, or Jeanne Shaheen, (when she’s sober) from railing against the helpless little lane.
        Dome of Glass, therefore, am going to contact our congressman ─ as soon as we finds out who they is ─ and demand that he, she, and it introduce a bill in Congress to change the name from Wall Street to Barack Obama Road or Barney Frank Alleyway or Ted Kennedy Bridle Path.
        That outta put a stop to all the nonsense!

    ***During an appearance on the Letterman show a few days ago, raving lunatic newsman Keith Olbermann explained that he had been fired by Current TV (Al Gore’s grubby little hyper-liberal opinion channel) because he was like a $10 million chandelier without a house in which to hang. (He meant to say without a whorehouse in which to hang, but screwed up the line.)


        Keith Olbermann (left) explaining to Dave, "I am a
        chandelier, I tell you, a $10 million chandelier!"
        (Click pic to enlarge.)


        Olbermann’s session on the show ended prematurely after he began reciting a poem of his own composition ─ "Shall I compare me to a summer’s day?/I am more lovely and more brilliant..." Letterman gestured offstage and several burly nurses subdued the foaming Olbermann with tranquilizer darts, strapped him into a gurney, and carted him off to Bellevue.
        With the departure of its star anchorman, Current TV lost no time in replacing him with former New York Governor and leading hooker-fancier Eliot (call me john) Spitzer.

    ***The dread word "niggardly" has again reared its head (or headed its rear) this time from out of the mouth of a card-carrying DEMOCRAT.
        Speaking on MSNBC, Ohio senator Sherrod Brown, a WHITE man (i.e., a honky) chastised Congress for being NIGGARDLY in its treatment of veterans.
        Some apologists claim the left-leaning senator was unaware the word has been redefined by the PC police from its ancient meaning of "stingy" to the modern "behaving like a nigger."
        I don’t buy into that crap. The man is obviously a neo-Nazi swine deserving of the severest possible punishment under the hate-crime statutes of this great land. Removal from office followed by a sound thrashing at the hands of Al Sharpton, Valerie Jarrett, and Jesse Jackson and 24 hours of taped speeches by President Obama are the least he deserves.
        But perhaps some good may come from this shocking incident. Niggardly is far from the only racially, ethnically, religiously, sexually insensitive word in the language.
        If you are of German extraction, how could you not but be offended by being asked if you take sauerKRAUT with your hotdog, or by being called HUN by your girlfriend?
        Suppose you’re Italian, how would you feel if you were given a Burger King WHOPper or invited to visit New GUINEA; or if Hispanic, by someone suggesting you use SPIC and Span to clean your linoleum?
        Imagine the hurtfulness for a gay executive when his boss tells him not to QUEER the deal or for a Japanese gentleman when he overhears some roundeye saying that crime must be NIPped in the bud or a rock climber in Alaska crassly remarking that "there’s a little NIP in the air."
        Try to put yourself in the shoes of an Asian-American housewife when a plumber informs her of a CHINK in the bathtub that needs repair...or an African-American lad whose teacher tells him that his work SHINES.
        And what of our Hebraic countrypersons who are bombarded daily with words and phrases such as JEWelry, JUnior, JUry, and "DJOU see the boobs on that chick?"
        So listen up good, all you Liberals out there: It’s time to call a SPADE a SPADE, to roll up the sleeves on your little cashmere wool sweaters, and to get to work. There are so many wrongs to right and so much print space and bandwidth in which to do it.

    ***William C. Rhoden, a sportswriter for the New York Times and one of the few black journalists employed on the paper, is a man who pole vaults into bed each night for fear that some white bigot lurking beneath might grab him and rape him.
        Here’s an observation from his latest column:

    "When was the last time a young, untested professional African-American athlete received the type of adulation Tim Tebow and Jeremy Lin have seen this year?"

        Forget Tebow ─ he’s taken as much flak as he has praise for his outspoken Christianity. Tebow is window dressing. Rhoden’s target is Lin.

       
          William Rhoden                     Jeremy Lin
        What pisses Rhoden off is that a polite, young, talented, self-effacing Chinese-American kid from Harvard has dared intrude on the African-American preserve that is the NBA. Motivated by a racially-tinged mixture of envy and bile, Rhoden hopes to spoil one of the few genuinely heart-warming stories to emerge this year, a story that has captivated Asians, Americans, and sports fans everywhere.
        Rhoden isn’t worth the time, effort, and energy it would take to lampoon him.
        He, the paper he works for, and the idiots who read his trash are self-satires. The man is a race-hustler. He butters his bread with lies about anyone who isn’t black.

    ***After Super Bowl XLVI, when a few asshole fans began shouting insults at her about her husband Tom Brady, Brazilian supermodel, actress, UN goodwill ambassador, diet guru, and new mommy Gisele Bündchen, shouted right back:
        "
    You need to catch the ball when you're supposed to catch the ball. My husband cannot fucking throw the ball and catch the ball at the same time."


                   Gisele ─ who else? (Click to enlarge)
        Right on girl!
        
    I’m a Giant fan, but that’s what I call standing up for your man.

    ***I’ve commented previously on the IVR (Interactive Voice Response) fad, an amazingly absurd technology that replaces a simple push on a phone button with a protracted and pointless conversation with a female automaton. This pervasive and nonsensical bullshit exists because an army of marketing assholes concluded that "IVR be cuttin’ edge an’ ever’body am doin’ it so us has got to be doin’ it too...duh."
        In a similarly asinine vein more and more news-oriented web sites (e.g., Drudge and USA Today) have rolled out Auto Refresh, a Medieval torture device that causes the page you’re watching to vanish every minute or two, then, (after a delightful pause to allow your blood pressure to rise) gradually reemerge.
        Why?
        
    Once again, following a few thousand meetings, the marketing assholes who run the corporate world merged their tiny brains and came up with this marvelously inane idea, upon which the leading cretin among them was assigned to draft a form email to be sent to all Chief Executive Morons:

    Uhhh, duhhhh...Boss Man or Boss Lady as Yous Cases Might Be.

    Uuuuhhh...Us marketing assholes been tinkin’ hardly and us agrees dat sum kinda AutoFrescha ting am gonna make peoples tink dat yous web sight is right on top of all da latest news stuff becawse ever’ time th’ page shuts off dey’ll...duuuhhh...tink yous is postin’ sum kinda hot new news tip stuff when yous aint. Y’followin' me?

        Of course, for you hundreds of millions of internet users who feel that Auto Refresh is infuriating crap, you can always take action. For example, email your thoughts to drudge@drudgereport.com . In a month or two you’ll hear back....nothing.
        Is there an alternative? Sure. Just resolve never to watch fucking Drudge or any other Auto Refresh site again..


    ***In a speech Monday, Attorney General Eric Holder said that voting rights for "minorities" are under assault. His chief complaint was that some states require voters to provide ID at the polls.
        For the sake of clarity, Dome of Glass offers this translation of Mr. Holder’s remarks:
    "Some states are preventing illegal immigrants, prison inmates, underage juveniles, dead people, and African-Americans with multiple identities from voting for Barack Obama."

    ***Lost in the pointless hoo-hah concerning the whereabouts of Ann Dunham at the time baby Barack vacated her womb, is a far more significant question: Why have Obama, his enablers, and his lawyers quashed disclosure of any objective information concerning his education, test scores, college theses, scholarly articles (or lack of same), scholarships, and academic performance?
        When a man and his camp followers invest major amounts of time, money, and financial resources in preventing the disclosure of what is, for most of us, totally innocuous information, the inescapable conclusion is that the man has something to hide.
        Among undisclosed documents and data:
        ● LSAT (Law School Admission Test) scores
        ● SAT (Scholastic Aptitude Test) Scores
        ● GRE (Graduate Record Examination) scores
        ● AFQT (Armed Forces Qualification Test) scores
        ● AGCT (Army General Classification Test) scores
        ● IQ test scores (routinely given to grade-schoolers)
        ● Achievement test scores (routinely given to grade-schoolers and high-school students)
        ● Records from kindergarten, grade school, high school, college, and law school
        ● Columbia University thesis
        ● Scholarships (if any)
        ● Scholarly articles (if any)
        ● Mentions in law reviews (if any)
        As I suggested in a prior post, long before Donald Trump started shooting off his mouth, the answer to this obfuscation is obvious.
        The man who was elected President in 2008 is a cardboard cutout, a puppet, an ignorant manipulandum who rose through the ranks of academia and politics via affirmative action, political pull, and the machinations of vultures like Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, Khalid al-Mansour, and Bill Ayers ─ people whose sole interest was to ride the Obama hobby-horse into power regardless of the consequences to the country.
        To say that Obama is arrogant or elitist or demagogic or a socialist is nonsense ─ the man doesn’t have the intellect to be any of those things.
        Barack H. Obama is a plain, out-and-out, natural-born ignoramus whose dim mind fancies that the American people are as stupid as he is.
        So far he is being proven correct.

    ***The New York Times, in a despicable exhibition of arrogance, bias, and intellectual corruption, hired the whining, brain-dead, little left-wing wimp Michael Kinsley to review President George W. Bush’s best seller, Decision Points.
        Be prepared for a shock. Kinsley didn’t like the book! What a fucking surprise!
        What plans do Sulzberger, Keller, et al have for future assignments? Ann Coulter to review Darwin?...Paul Krugman to critique Glenn Beck?...Katie Couric to discourse on Sarah Palin?...Chrisopher Hitchens to analyse the Old Testament?

    From Kinsley’s review:
    Bush’s policy [on stem cell research] continues to do damage by leaving the impression that stem cells are controversial and require some sort of compromise between science and morality.
    From the European Consortium for Stem Cell Research:
    Because a single, well-identified type of cell is affected in Parkinson’s disease, stem cells offer great potential for treatment.
    And this news item:
    In December 2001 Michael Kinsley announced that he has been suffering from Parkinson's disease for eight years.

        Let me sum up Kinsley’s belief system: "When it comes to my own skin, my own life, and my own well-being, morality can go fuck off."
        If this sorry excuse for a man had an atom of ethical fiber in his minute soul he would have recused himself as a reviewer for being hopelessly biased. But minor considerations such as ethics, fairness, intellectual honesty, journalistic standards (an oxymoron?), and common decency have never interfered with a true Liberal’s readiness to prostitute himself for a few dollars ─ nor with the New York Times readiness to cough up the 50 bucks per needed to purchase their scrawny butts.


    ***Question: Why is it that women with ponytails look cute and sexy, but men with ponytails look like total assholes?

    Video of the Year


        For my money, this is the funniest  video on the Web.
        It’s hardly a secret ─ the 1:21-minute You Tube clip of a dog being tormented by its master has racked up more than 44 million 53 million 63 million hits 89 million 106 million hits, many, no doubt, repeat visits.
        It came my way thanks to my old friend Jane Polley from Reader's Digest days.


    Comment Showcase

    Recent Entries

    1. Mc-Revolution in Mc-Food.
      Thursday, May 24, 2012
    2. Thomas Sowell on Race Wars
      Sunday, May 20, 2012
    3. Workers of the World Unite! You Have Nothing to Lose But Your Jobs
      Thursday, May 17, 2012
    4. Information About Comments
      Tuesday, May 15, 2012
    5. Want to Kill a Good Product? Contact Norm Mack at Dome of Glass
      Thursday, May 10, 2012
    6. Le Pauvre Henri
      Thursday, May 03, 2012
    7. Obama Comes Out of the Closet
      Tuesday, May 01, 2012
    8. Roots
      Thursday, April 26, 2012
    9. Thoughts on Abortion
      Thursday, April 19, 2012
    10. Alliteration, March Madness, and Basketball
      Thursday, April 12, 2012

    The Correct Me Archve

    ***The New York Times hit the nail (or Libyan) on the head October 21 with an editorial that is sure to stand alongside "Yes, Virginia, There Is a Santa Claus" and "Go West Young Man" in the Pantheon of Universal Inanity.
    While the civilized world (and Muslims as well) were dancing joyfully over the mutilated corpse of Muammar el-Qaddafi , the Times’ editorialists came swiftly to the aid of the nascent republic with profound and insightful advice. "Libyans must channel their passion into building a free and productive country" the headline screamed atop the NYT web site.
    Ohhh....My...God! Why didn’t I think of that!
    And here I was about to tweet the transitional Libyan government advising it to set up a repressive tyranny in their newly liberated tract of sand and clamp down on any signs of growth, prosperity, or happiness.
    Thank God for the New York Times! The newspaper of record deserves every Pulitzer Prize and Order of Lenin it has ever received or ever will receive.
    And there’s more good news! The Times has dispatched renowned columnist Paul Krugman and his sexy co-columnist Maureen Dowd to the desert non-kingdom to help the nation get on track for receiving massive American aid by ensuring that their camel-herding-based economy collapses.


    ***By coincidence, George Will's September 15, 2011 op-ed column, "All in the Federal Family," echoes my post of the same date, "In the Beginning Was the Word." Mr. Will, a well-known and respected syndicated columnist, writes:

    In societies governed by persuasion, politics is mostly talk, so liberals’ impoverishment of their vocabulary matters. Having damaged liberalism’s reputation, they call themselves progressives. Having made the federal government’s pretensions absurd, they have resurrected the supposed synonym "federal family."
    Having made federal spending suspect, they advocate "investments for job creation," a euphemism for stimulus, another word they have made toxic

    In Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland Lewis Carroll describes Alice’s trial by a pack of cards led by the tyrannical King and Queen of Hearts.

    "Hold your tongue!" said the Queen, turning purple.
    "I won't!" said Alice.
    "Off with her head!" the Queen shouted at the top of her voice. Nobody moved.
    "Who cares for you?" said Alice, (she had grown to her full size by this time.) "You're nothing but a pack of cards!"

    Friends, there is no need to knuckle in to a limp-wrist cabal of timorously vicious assholes.
    It’s time and past time to take up arms against liberalism’s war on the English language. Liberals are nothing but a pack of cards.

    ***Somebody named Hilton Als (with a name like that you just know he’s gay), in a paean to late fag-hag playwright Wendy Wasserstein in the September 12, 2011 New Yorker, observed that Wasserstein belonged to "that generation of playwrights [that]...sent up institutions like heterosexuality and marriage."


           Wendy                      Hilton
    I don’t know Wasserstein’s oeuvre from a hole in the wall nor do I care to; nor do I know to which planet she sent up the various targets of her displeasure.
    Neither do I know Mr. Als and his oeuvre (if he possesses any) nor do I care to.
    What I do know is that anyone who refers to heterosexuality as an institution is an illiterate asshole not to mention a paying member of the Church of Gayness.
    As President Obama might say and often does: Let me make myself perfectly clear:

    ● The Smithsonian is an Institution.
    ● Slavery is an Institution.
    ● Harvard is an Institution.
    ● Marriage is an Institution.

    But Heterosexuality?
    Is a Vagina an institution? Is Testosterone an Institution? Is Love an Institution? Is Masculinity an Institution? Is Hunger an Institution? Is an Erection an Institution? Is Sexual Intercourse an Institution? Is Death an Institution?
    To pursue Hilton’s logic, I guess he considers Fag-Haggery, Homosexuality, and Pedophilia to be Institutions as well.
    What a friggin’ jackass.
    [And yeah, I did a Google check and Mr. Als is indeed gay. So now we know why the New Yorker hired him.]

    ***I don’t know much about Jon Huntsman, former Utah governor and Jonny-come-lately to the crowded field of Republican presidential hopefuls, but judging from the quantity of front page space devoted to Jon in the New York Times, he is Liberaldom’s John McCain/Bob Dole straw man of choice for the current election cycle.
    Mr. Huntsman is trim, moneyed, and Mormanish with distinguished graying hair, a cute first name, and no discernable moral or political convictions that might get in the way of a sound thrashing in 2012 by Pinch Sulzberger paramour, Barack Obama.

    ***The last space shuttle has, supposedly, made its final flight. I guess NASA and the D.C. bureaucrats will now busy themselves with some new scheme on which to squander a few trillion rapidly depreciating U.S. dollars ─ maybe a manned flight to Jupiter to investigate a mysterious black monolith that recently landed on the moon.
    Even when I was an aerospace engineer at RCA,
    I didn't see much purpose in burning up vast quantities of fuel in order to shoot Americans into space except, perhaps, to beat the Russians to the punch or to prevent an army of technicians and scientists from going into marketing or becoming hedge fund managers.
    Yeah, yeah, yeah....I know...we might not have had space blankets and zero-gravity crappers without the Apollo program, and we certainly wouldn’t have been treated to Neil Armstrong fucking up his little speech when he set foot on the moon. (If it had been Obama, he would have had a teleprompter to help out.)
    As I mention in a recent post, the Englishman George Mallory was keen on climbing Mt. Everest because it was there.
    That’s about the long and short of why we send men into space ─ with one important difference: Mallory had the right to do anything he wanted with his own life and fortune no matter how stupid, but ferrying people back and forth from space platforms or propelling them to the moon, mars, or whatever, involves absurd amounts of time, resources, and taxpayer money.
    In the future, let’s stick to using outer space for what God intended ─ to provide TV service to Uganda, Antarctica, and New Hampshire, to spy on the North Korean missile program, and to help female drivers find their way home after a few too many in the local bistro.
    This country should get the hell out of the manned space flight business. It’s a total loser. And if, 20 years from now, we wake up to learn that Mao Zedong has become the first mummified Chinese tyrant to land on Uranus, who gives a good goddamn.

    ***I see that CNN has cancelled liberal whore-master Elliot Spitzer’s "In the Arena" bullshit-fest, itself successor to the previously cancelled "Parker-Spitzer" bullshit-fest co-starring pseudo-conservative dishrag Kathleen Parker.


           Kathleen and Eliot in happier times.

    When Parker was dumped a few months ago, I advised CNN to pair Spitzer with a conservative female who didn’t feel impelled to preface her every observation with "I may be wrong, but..." or "Perhaps your right, however,..." or "In my opinion, Eliot..." Not surprisingly, CNN’s management didn’t heed my advice.
    After all, folks, faithful members of the Church of Liberalism, those tingly-legged souls who control the media, would happily see their organizations wither and die rather than allow an opposition spokesperson to enter their crumbling cathedral.

    ***Plaxico Burress, the wide receiver who caught the winning touchdown pass in Super Bowl XLII that ended the New England Patriots perfect season, has been released from prison after serving two years on a gun charge.


    Plaxico's Super Bowl-winning catch for the Giants

    You may recall that Plaxico managed to shoot himself in the thigh in a New York City nightclub in 2008. As the tale goes, he had tucked his Glock semi-automatic into the waistband of his sweatpants. Not surprisingly, the gun began sliding down his leg. Not surprisingly, he attempted to stem the descent. Not surprisingly, he accidentally pulled the trigger.
    A loud bang ensued followed by EMS workers, police, bail postings, lawyers, sentencing, and a speech by Mayor Bloomberg.
    Now that Plaxico has paid his debt to society and is looking for a job, he has pledged to assist the Urban League and the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. "Guns don’t help anybody," Plaxico is quoted as saying.
    I’m not sure that is a universal truth, but I will say that it is a universal truth that one should not wear sweatpants to a New York City nightclub whether or not one is packing a Glock.
    In any event, I wish Plaxico the best. He’s one hell of a wideout even he is a can short of a six-pack..

    UPDATE! Plaxico has signed with the Jets. I was hoping he'd return to the Giants, but what the heck, half a cup's better than none.


    ***The Infidel World (us) is currently being entertained by a traditional media cud-chewing extravaganza involving so-called uprisings that have been roiling the Islamic World (them).
    Youthful idealists in Tunisia, Lebanon, Egypt, and Yemen (soon to be followed, no doubt, by faithful followers of The Prophet elsewhere) have been busy for several months rioting, looting, setting themselves on fire, issuing threats, making strange noises with their tongues, stoning women, and Allahu-Akbaring. In other words, as my wife used to put it in re her sons’ activities after they reached the age of jerk-off, they’ve been "doing their thing."
    Food shortages, foreign instigators, intrusive journalists, Twitter, Facebook, cell phones, unemployment, rigged elections, despotic rulers, Zionist conspiracies, U. S. perfidy, Hillary Clinton’s stumpy legs, Disney’s glorification of an Unbeliever Mouse, Richard the Lionhearted’s attempt to wrest Jerusalem from the Turks, Alexander the Great’s conquest of the Persian Empire, Danish cartoonists, Koran flushings, and Barack Obama’s failure to perform Wudu after pissing have all been adduced as sparks that set off the conflagrations.
    Perhaps. But careful regression analyses and several triple-blind studies by Dome of Glass cast doubt on these explanations.
    It now emerges that peoples of Islamic persuasion require periodic mass "freshenings" (rioting, looting, setting themselves on fire, issuing threats, making strange noises with their tongues, stoning women, and Allahu-Akbaring) every 50 to 75 years to freshen and reinvigorate the population’s healthy flow of fanaticism, much as a dairy cow needs to be fucked every few years in order to freshen and reinvigorate her flow of milk.
    In the case of a typical cow, the casus fucking is, generally, the cow going into heat in the vicinity of a bull.
    In the case of a typical Mohammedan mob, the casus dementia can be almost anything provided a full moon, television cameras, BBC crews, and Jimmy Carter are in the area.

    ***A few years back, a large, muscular White moron named Mark Gastineau, a defensive end for the New York Jets, took to performing what he called a "Sack Dance" whenever he brought down a quarterback.
    Everyone thought he was an asshole.
    Everyone was right.
    The league outlawed his "dance."



           Mark Gastineau doing his sack
           dance over a fallen quarterback

    Nowadays when a Black football player pulls the same sort of crap or worse the broadcasters and commentators chime in: "He’s letting his emotions hang out"...:He’s having fun"..."The fans love it"..."Let the kid enjoy himself."
    Well I don’t know what fans other than myself love, but when a 300-pound lineman performs simulated sexual intercourse after he sacks a quarterback or a 250-pound running back prances around jiggling his ass after scoring a touchdown or a six-foot-four wideout does the cakewalk after he catches a pass or a 260-pound linebacker straddles the man he has just tackled and beats on his chest like a mountain gorilla, he is insulting his opponents, debasing himself, and acting as if his audience is as crass and stupid as he is...even if he is Black.
    What? I’m a racist? Fuck you.
    It’s the media whores and coaches and team owners and NFL officials — the White apologists who think of Blacks as children with ADHD and who, out of fear and bigotry, permit and abet these ugly, undignified, embarrassing, and unsportsmanlike displays — that are the real racists.

    ***In a recent NYT recap of L’Affaire Olbermann, replete with typical liberal euphemisms for left-wing fascists ("outspoken," "distinctive," "mercurial," "forceful"), reporters Bill Carter and Brian Stelter emphasize Olbermann’s role in hiking MSNBC’s ratings and establishing the channel’s "brand.". According to the article, Olbermann’s daily rant and frequent Paul Harvey-like cornball readings of James Thurber stories, boosted MSNBC viewership from several hundred thousand to a million plus.
    What nobody seems to ask is: What sort of people constituted Olbermann’s following? Since I personally never met anyone who admitted to watching the show, my assumption is that the audience for a rabble-rouser like Olbermann consisted (you guessed it) of rabble.
    Look friends, any psychotic megalomaniac with a prime-time slot on cable TV can entice a million or two zombies to tune in provided the channel is jake with having the dregs of the earth as an audience and can dig up enough zombie advertisers and wealthy zombie activists like George Soros to foot the bill.

    ***The New York Times, America’s crusading or jihading Newspaper of Record, has once again trumped the opposition.
    In a stunning and highly disturbing exposé published August 11 by two Jews and someone who sounds Polish, the Times has revealed a horrific shortage of "minority" third-base coaches in major league baseball. Here are the shocking facts straight from the horse’s ass, er, I mean mouth as reported by Alan Schwarz, Thomas Kaplan, and Jack Styczynski:


    About 40 percent of the players in Major League Baseball are black, Hispanic or Asian, and the sport is seen as a leading example of diversity, yet a curious disparity has emerged in a corner of the game.
    Among baseball’s 30 teams, only 23 percent of the third-base coaches are members of minorities, compared with 67 percent of its first-base coaches. The disparity has existed for decades but it is now about twice as large as it was in 1990, based on an analysis by The New York Times.
    The question is why.
    It is more than a mysterious quirk...

    Is there no bottom to the bottomless pit of American bigotry...no top to its topless tower of anti-minority evil?
    The Times itself, despite valiant efforts to purge racists from within its own ranks, has unwittingly fallen prey to the awful sickness of discrimination.
    Why have Schwarz, Kaplan, and Styczynski failed to note that not one quadriplegic Asian is employed as a batperson by the Boston Red Sox?...That not a single Hispanic lesbian has ever hit in the cleanup position for the New York Yankees?...That only one midget has ever appeared in a major league game and, after he drew a base on balls on four straight pitches, the powers that be forbade future midgets from appearing in lineups?


    Eddie Gaedel at bat in 1951 for the White Sox,

    And how many seven-foot-tall black sportswriters are employed at the Times despite the fact that 11.37 per cent of players in the NBA are seven-foot-tall blacks? None! Coincidence? Mysterious quirk? I think not.
    I leave you with this final thought:
    Independent and rather sloppy research by Dome of Glass has found that 99.98 percent of cornerbacks in the National Football League are African American or some other kind of African and yet There Is Not a Single Black Third-Base Coach in the NFL!

    BULLETIN! The Boston Red Sox have just named Daisuke Matsuzaka as their third-base coach. This raises the percentage of Asian-non-American third-base coaches to 3.333% (6.667% if you count Dice-K’s interpreter who will share the position with him since none of Dice-K's teammates speaks Japanese)


    ***My wife and I went to buy a car last November to replace our ’95 Saturn. Our first stop was the Mazda dealer in Keene. As soon as we arrived, a heavyset member of that peculiar breed of human known as A Car Salesman bounded smilingly out of the showroom.
    "What can I do for you folks?" it inquired.
    "We’re looking for a new car," I said.
    "Anything in particular?" it asked.
    "Small," I said. "Cheap."
    Its smile faded, but it gamely led us to a collection of several hundred vehicles in various shades of maroon, blue, silver, red, gray, white, and black arrayed in a row like whores in a cat house.
    I took one look and said, "What the hell are these things?"
    "Introducing the new, updated, redesigned, improved 2010 Mazda3," the Car Salesman proudly said.
    .

    2010 Mazda3. Teeth, mustache, and pink eyes
    available for modest cost at DOMEOFGLASS.com
    I stared at the Car Salesman, stared at my wife, stared back at the Car Salesman, gathered my thoughts.. "These are the fucking ugliest automobiles I have ever seen," I said politely. "Do you have any 2009 leftovers?"
    "They’re all sold," said the Car Salesman.
    "I can understand why," I said.
    "Let me tell you about the exciting new features in our ‘10s. There’s..."
    "I don’t care how many new features these monstrosities have. I’m not going to get up in the morning, go to the garage, and be greeted by a gaping, grinning, chrome-lipped black-holed car snout. Who designed the damn thing; the make-up guy who did Heath Ledger as the Joker?"
    "But..."
    "Sayonara. I’ll see you at the bankruptcy proceedings." And with that my wife and I took off as fast as our pickup could manage, praying the while that the horrific image of the new, improved, exciting 2010 Mazda3 would not linger in our nightmares.
    ─────
    Back home, gin-and-tonic in hand, Two and a Half Men on the boob tube, I reviewed the day’s events. What in God’s name possessed the executives at Mazda to approve of this abomination, I asked myself.
    At first I assumed the idiots in marketing were to blame, but I soon rejected this hypothesis ─ it takes a perverse sort of genius to come up with something so appalling as the 2010 Mazda3, and it’s well-known that marketers don’t have any genius, perverse or otherwise.
    No, I decided, there was only one possible explanation for the vehicle: An agent employed by one of Mazda’s evil competitors ─ Honda, Toyota, Subaru, Isuzu, Suzuki, Mitsubishi, Hyundai, Kia ─ must have infiltrated the firm’s top management, installed Paris Hilton as head of automotive design, replaced the design team’s engineers with Haitian Zombies, and then bribed, black-mailed, and seduced the CEO, COO, and Board of Directors into approving the resultant catastrophe.

    About


        The image of the young lady crouching alongside her pet sabretooth is from “Savage Pellucidar,” a painting by the great Frank Frazetta.
         “Dome of Glass” is a reference to Percy Bysshe Shelley’s poem "Adonais," which contains the lines:
             Life like a dome of many-colored glass,
             Stains the white radiance of Eternity,
             Until Death tramples it to fragments.

        The poem is an elegy to fellow poet John Keats who died of tuberculosis in Rome, February 23, 1821, at the age of 26.


    Subscribe